![]()
The techniques and tools needed to perform Human Security evaluations include social engineering employees. The primary purpose of this OSSTMM section is to ascertain the effectiveness of security training within an organization. These four channels are positively impacted the greatest from auditing and penetration testing and involve most of the 10 security domains identified by (ISC) 2 (as discussed in Chapter 3). ![]() The OSSTMM uses the term “channel” to classify different security areas of interest within an organization, including physical security, wireless communications, telecommunications, and data networks. Regardless, the Rules of Engagement section of the OSSTMM does have valuable information in it and should be read and followed. However, there are many things lacking that a project manager would need to augment to improve the success of a PenTest project (or any project for that matter), including procurement, risk identification (within the project, not the target system), qualitative and quantitative risk analysis, obtaining human resources, cost estimates, and controls. In some penetration tests, this may be sufficient to satisfy clients. The following is an excerpt from the “Rules of Engagement” within the OSSTMM listing what is required before the project can start – issues surrounding best practices are not presented here but certainly can be found within the document itself ( Herzog, 2008): ■Ĭonfidentiality and Nondisclosure Assurance ■ The information provided within the OSSTMM does include some industry best practices, which are beneficial for a project manager who has not had any experience within the PenTest community. #Networx security manual professionalAlthough the OSSTMM is a bit more extensive in itemizing parts of what belongs in a professional penetration test project than the ISSAF, no processes are provided for the project manager to leverage when assigned to a PenTest project. In an effort to address some project requirements, the OSSTMM mandates certain activities occur and various documents be generated. Version 2.2 of the OSSTMM is significantly different from the newer version, which seems to have been rewritten from the ground up to cover multiple security domains beyond just networks and systems. As a methodology you cannot learn from it how or why something should be tested however, what you can do is incorporate it into your auditing needs, harmonize it with existing laws and policies, and conform it to be the framework you need to assure a thorough security audit through all channels.Īn earlier version of the OSSTMM can also be found on the BackTrack disk included on the accompanying DVD. It includes information for project planning, quantifying results, and the rules of engagement for those who will perform the security audits. This methodology has continued to provide straight, factual tests for factual answers. #Networx security manual manualsThe authors of the OSSTMM describe the manuals as follows ( Herzog, 2008): #Networx security manual manualThe manual is developed using peer reviews and is published under Open Source licenses and can be obtained at Although the OSSTMM provides a methodology to perform penetration tests, it is foremost an auditing methodology that can satisfy regulatory and industry requirements when used against corporate assets. The current release is version 3.0 and is maintained by the Institute for Security and Open Methodologies (ISECOM). The OSSTMM was first introduced to the Information System Security industry in 2000. ![]() Whether an internal or external penetration testing group, it is a good idea to belong to one of the professional security associations in the area, such as the Information Systems Security Association (ISSA) or Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |